<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Genre and transfer in a multimodal composition class&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ceball.com/tenure/2009/10/20/multimodal-multimedia-multigenre-composition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ceball.com/tenure/2009/10/20/multimodal-multimedia-multigenre-composition/</link>
	<description>Associate Professor of New Media Studies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 20:39:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cball</title>
		<link>http://www.ceball.com/tenure/2009/10/20/multimodal-multimedia-multigenre-composition/comment-page-1/#comment-1261</link>
		<dc:creator>cball</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 18:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ceball.com/tenure/?p=336#comment-1261</guid>
		<description>11/28/09: Chapter feedback from first round of editorial review at Pittsburgh UP:

&quot;Without question, this is one of the strongest essays in the collection. Ball et al takes to practice the question of the affect of multimodality on scholarly critical writing within composition and rhetoric. This piece felt the most comfortable in the discussion of hands-on practice and its transformative capacities. That said, the student testimonials were not evocative, even somewhat &#039;wow/less&#039; -- a disappointing dip in the most dexterous, use-filled and wow-full essay in the collection.&quot;

On to revisions of the chapter to make the student testimonials equally wowful, as they deserve to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>11/28/09: Chapter feedback from first round of editorial review at Pittsburgh UP:</p>
<p>&#8220;Without question, this is one of the strongest essays in the collection. Ball et al takes to practice the question of the affect of multimodality on scholarly critical writing within composition and rhetoric. This piece felt the most comfortable in the discussion of hands-on practice and its transformative capacities. That said, the student testimonials were not evocative, even somewhat &#8216;wow/less&#8217; &#8212; a disappointing dip in the most dexterous, use-filled and wow-full essay in the collection.&#8221;</p>
<p>On to revisions of the chapter to make the student testimonials equally wowful, as they deserve to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

